Early Assurance for the Secure SDLC

At Source Code Level
SAST Security Analysis

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

We analyse your applications without running them, at source code level, detecting security vulnerabilities, configuration errors and risky code patterns at an early stage. We turn the SAST output into not merely a "list of findings" but a closable work package that teams can convert into action.

What Do We Offer? How Does the Process Work? Schedule a Meeting

What Do We Offer? SAST Service Scope

We treat the SAST engagement not merely as automated scan output, but as a control mechanism serving secure software development goals — one that turns findings into work. The analysis outputs are structured in alignment with sprint planning, risk acceptance processes and audit trails.

Repo / Module-Based Analysis

Rather than treating the codebase as a "single block", the scope is built around modules, services and critical flows. Where risk is concentrated becomes clearly visible; team responsibilities are simplified.

Triage: False Positive Management

SAST outputs naturally produce noise. Findings are verified, false positives are filtered out and real risks are prioritised. The goal: a focusable remediation list.

OWASP / CWE Classification

Findings are classified in alignment with corporate control catalogues. Risk themes become clear in management reports and a reference standard is provided for audits.

Developer-Oriented Finding Format

Each finding is presented with its risk impact, a possible exploitation scenario, the affected component and an applicable remediation recommendation. The questions "what is there?" and "how is it closed?" are answered in a single package.

Post-Remediation Verification

After closures, verification is performed with re-analysis. The audit trail is completed and the permanent reduction of risk is demonstrated.

CI/CD-Compatible Outputs

Formats appropriate to the organisation's software delivery discipline can be produced. Security becomes a sustainable control layer, not a one-off "campaign".

Who Is It For? Target Audience and Scenarios

SAST produces higher value as software development processes mature. In organisations seeking a balance between "fast delivery" and "controlled risk", it makes the security dimension of technical debt measurable.

  • Enterprise product teams: Teams with long-lived codebases, regular releases and multiple modules to manage.
  • Regulation-driven organisations: Organisations seeking to standardise reporting, traceability and control requirements.
  • Those targeting DevSecOps: Those who want to move security into the pipeline and reduce cost through "early detection".
  • Those managing suppliers: Those who want to measure the minimum security bar of outsourced code and track improvement actions.
  • Fast-growing projects: Those who want to establish the right security habits early and limit future technical debt.

Why Is SAST Strategic?

When a vulnerability reaches production, the remediation cost increases: emergency patches, regression risk, additional testing needs and operational downtime. SAST catches risks while the code is still in motion. The development team progresses with fewer interruptions, management sees a clearer risk picture, and the audit side gains a consistent control mechanism.

How Does the Process Work? Managed with Pipeline Logic

We treat SAST not as a "one-off scan" but as a lifecycle involving scoping, verification, prioritisation and closure validation. We offer a framework adaptable to different scales.

Scope & Access Model

The repo structure, technology stack, critical modules and targeted deliverables are clarified. The access model is defined according to operational security principles.

Analysis Design & Rule Set

SAST analyses are designed for the target architecture. Rule sets appropriate to the project's reality are selected with the aim of catching risky patterns.

Triage & Prioritisation

Findings are verified and false positives are filtered out. Prioritisation is based on exploitability, business impact and component criticality.

Reporting & Action Plan

An executive summary and a technical report are produced together. The finding format is structured to include impact, evidence, references and remediation guidance.

Re-test & Closure Validation

After remediation, re-analysis is performed to confirm closure. Remaining risks and technical debt items are clearly flagged.

Continuity (Optional)

In line with the organisation's goals, SAST can be turned into a control mechanism run at regular intervals or before releases.

Operational Approach: Testing Without Creating Risk

Although a SAST engagement places no load on live systems, source code access and the sharing of outputs must be managed from a security standpoint. The access model, data confidentiality and authorisation processes are clarified before the work begins.

Deliverables Usable and Traceable

The deliverable set enables technical teams to take rapid action while supporting risk visibility and measurability on the management side. The aim is for the output to be not an "archive" but an improvement engine.

Executive Summary
Aggregation of risk themes, highlighting of critical findings, and an overall security level assessment. Produces a clear answer to "what should we focus on?"
Technical Detail Report
Finding-level technical explanations, affected module/component, risk impact, reference classification and remediation guidance.
Prioritised Finding List
Verified findings after triage, structured with priority, classification, component and status information.
Remediation Guide
Secure coding practices, recommendations to reduce recurrence, and remediation approaches for critical findings.
Re-test / Closure Validation
Re-analysis and closure confirmation after remediation. Remaining risks and technical debt areas are clearly flagged.

How Is Output Quality Maintained?

The effectiveness of SAST depends on correct scoping, triage discipline and adapting the report format to the development team's real needs. Rather than merely sharing automated output, we base our work on presenting verified findings with prioritisation logic.

Frequently Asked Questions About SAST

Positioning SAST correctly starts with clarifying expectations. The answers below address the topics organisations most frequently clarify.

Does SAST affect live systems?
No. SAST analyses the source code or build artefacts without running the application. It places no direct load on the production environment. The critical matters are the code access model, the sharing of outputs and confidentiality management.
Are SAST and DAST the same thing?
No. SAST provides "early detection" at the code level; DAST tests the running application from the outside. The strongest approach is to design the two methods to complement each other.
How does SAST output turn into action within the team?
Findings are triaged, verified and prioritised. Each finding is assessed in the context of impact, exploitability and component criticality. The result is a closable finding set aligned with sprint planning.
How often should SAST be performed?
Two approaches are common: (i) periodic checks before major releases, (ii) regular runs within the Secure SDLC/DevSecOps cycle. The choice depends on release frequency, team maturity and risk appetite.
How is source code confidentiality managed?
Access, authorisation and sharing procedures are defined at the outset. Code access is managed with a model appropriate to the organisation's security requirements; outputs are structured so as not to create unnecessary data leakage.

Let's Define the SAST Scope Together

Let's design the SAST plan according to your application's technology stack, module structure and delivery rhythm. With verified findings and a prioritised action set, let's make security a natural part of the development process.

[email protected] Contact Page